Automatic deductions for not having the firm's address and phone number on the home page and for the scrolling-text Java applet. And to add insult to annoyance, the Java applet (which adds zero value to the site) appears on multiple pages throughout the site. We counted five undated articles in the "Articles" section, which is not many considering the firm as 23 offices worldwide. Firms with a great deal of content on their Web site occasionally publish a Web site under another domain name. Here is an example of a firm with little to no content on it's main site, and yet the firm's insurance group has its own site at www.insurelegal.com. That site has monthly articles on insurance law. Oddly, the insurance section of the main site does not link to www.insurelegal.com. The section on recruiting is quite helpful, and it employs (no pun intended) an entirely different look-and-feel, which makes us think that this section and the rest of the site were developed by different groups. And the site's disclaimer was 404. Site navigation was aided by a graphical navigation bar that was used on the bottom of most pages, but a search engine and bookmark-friendly titles would be a welcome addition. Graphics were first-rate on the recruiting section and just short of first-rate on the rest of the site. Some attorney profiles were available, but they were buried under "practice areas," so if you were looking for a lawyer by name (not an unusual task), you'd have to know that attorney's area of practice.