One measure of a site is how current the information is. In some sites, they place no emphasis on publishing new information. For those (most of which are just expanded firm brochures), it isn't expected that people will return often to visit the site. But for firms that HAVE made publishing content a priority (and a strategy that clearly we endorse), we check "What's New" to see how committed the firm is. In Brown, Todd & Heyburn's case, they have published some content, but it isn't at all clear that it's all new. In fact, clicking on one of the articles listed (we couldn't resist reading an article from the "Journal of Explosive Engineering") produced an article that, while undated, talks about information from 1997. They can do better. The Legal Pad suffers the same fate - though the firm describes the articles in the Legal Pad as late-breaking alerts, all are undated and many refer to dated info. The attorney directory is decent - it lists all attorneys, their e-mail addresses and phone numbers, but provides links to Martindale-Hubbell.