| | | | | Website Reviews Is your law firm website rated "A" or better? Read our reviews (or search for your firm) to see. If so, feel free to include the following graphic on your site (or another if your site rates even higher). |
| | | Behind The Reviews Written by RedStreet founders Erik J. Heels and Richard P. Klau, the book RedStreet's Best Legal Websites 2000 includes the research methodology, analysis, and statistics behind the reviews; detailed scores in 50 categories for the nation's largest 300 law firms; and details about the best website designers. |
| | | Website Audits Unhappy with your current website? See why NLJ 250 law firms are hiring RedStreet to conduct in-depth audits of their current sites. Some have called our audits "an essential first step" in the redesign process. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [advertising info] | | | | | | | | | | | Anderson Kill & Olick | http://www.andersonkill.com | | Content: 7 | Presentation: 1 | Experience: 6 | Total: 14 | Content: B | Presentation: F | Experience: C | Total: C | | | | This site is the worst law firm Web site we have ever seen. Or at least the one with the worst presentation. The splash page teases "We are not the enemy," and then (using a client pull), the home page appears with a semi-randomly chosen lawyer joke graphic at its head. Hit the reload button on your browser to see them all. Who is this site for? Clients? Potential clients? Potential clerks or associates? Think about it. The "jokes" (if you can call them that) are in graphics, so they will not get indexed by any of the search engines. So potential clients looking for lawyer jokes with a search engine will not find this site. And what impression is given to potential clients? To current clients? Sometimes the all-press-is-good-press rule does not apply, and bad press is, indeed, bad. All of their 1996 and 1997 newsletters (covering lender, insurance, and employment law issues) are online, and they have announced plans to upload newsletters from 1994 and 1995. The insurance resources section contains links to a wealth of insurance-related Web sites. And the Vacatur Center provides compelling arguments for why the policy of vacating legal precedents should be stopped. If you can get past the front page and the home page (and I suspect many will not be bale to), there is a lot of good content here. And the organization is crisp. |
| |